“Civilizational Alliance”: What the US Is Proposing to Europe

Key Takeaways

Western decline is a choice, not destiny. Clear relative decline in demographics, economy, industry, social cohesion, and military power—but it’s reversible with bold political decisions.
Trump is proposing a “civilizational alliance” with Europe. Not just NATO or trade, but a deeper partnership to jointly defend and revive Western values: individual freedom, national sovereignty, faith, family, secure borders, and pride in our heritage.
The real threat is internal—Europe must decide. Identity crisis, borderless cosmopolitanism, and self-guilt are the biggest dangers. Europe can rebirth by reclaiming its roots alongside the U.S., or keep dissolving. The choice is Europe’s.

Decline is a choice
and it’s a choice we can refuse to make
Marco Rubio

On February 14, 2026, at the Munich Security Conference, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered a speech meant to spark some serious soul-searching about Europe’s future and identity. This wasn’t just another geopolitical rundown; it was a call to face an uncomfortable truth: the West has taken a path that has left it weaker, and now it risks losing not only global influence but the very ability to preserve its own civilization. Rubio didn’t address Europe as some ordinary ally — he spoke to it like an older brother in trouble, bound to the United States by deep historical, cultural, and spiritual ties that no short-term disagreement can break.

Through Rubio’s speech, the new National Security Strategy, and pieces like Samuel Samson’s contribution, the Trump administration is offering Europe not a breakup but a renewed and deeper alliance: a “civilizational” one. No longer based solely on economic or military interests, but on a shared determination to defend and revive the Western heritage — of freedom, national sovereignty, faith, family, and pride.

What Rubio Said

In his address, Marco Rubio spoke to Europe as America’s historic partner in defending Western civilization — as a friend, really a close relative, that the U.S. neither wants nor can abandon. Because of bonds that are historical, cultural, and even spiritual.

The U.S. and Europe face a historic mission together. After winning the Cold War, a dangerous illusion took hold: the “end of history.” Ignoring human nature and the lessons of the past, we embraced unchecked free trade dogma that led to offshoring, shuttered factories, millions of lost jobs, and dependence on supply chains controlled by rivals or adversaries. We handed sovereignty over to international bodies, adopted self-defeating energy policies, and allowed uncontrolled mass immigration that threatens social cohesion, cultural continuity, and the future of Western peoples. These mistakes were made together, and now they must be fixed together. That’s the historic mission binding America and Europe.

The Secretary of State stressed that national security isn’t just about technical military spending levels, important as they are. An armed force doesn’t fight for legal abstractions — it fights to defend a people, a nation, a way of life, and a great civilization worth being proud of. And ours is the one that gave the world freedom, the rule of law, universities, and the scientific revolution.

The Trump administration’s proposal is for a renewed alliance that rebuilds industry, regains sovereignty over supply chains, secures national borders as a core act of sovereignty, and invests together in new frontiers like space and technology. The decline of the West isn’t inevitable: it’s a choice. Just as we chose to resist and rebuild after 1945, today we can choose rebirth. The United States doesn’t want weak allies who guilt-trip themselves or have resigned themselves to decline; it wants strong partners, proud of their heritage and determined to defend it. America remains Europe’s daughter and wants to write a new century of prosperity and vitality for Western civilization together. Not separation, but a rebirth of the transatlantic alliance on fresh foundations.

Is the West in Decline?

Rubio’s speech rests on a core premise: that the West, and Europe in particular, is in a phase of historical decline. Is that starting assumption correct?

Plenty of hard data points to the West going through a phase of relative historical decline.

The deepest and most fundamental sign is demographic. In 1900, 30% of the world’s population lived in Europe or North America; today that share has fallen below 14% — even with unprecedented immigration from the rest of the world to both continents. This relative drop reflects not just faster growth in Asia and Africa, but also the West’s inability to sustain an adequate rate of demographic renewal.

In Europe and the United States, fertility rates have been well below the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman for decades. In the European Union, the average has dropped below 1.4, with countries like Italy, Spain, and Malta posting some of the world’s lowest rates. In the U.S., it fell to around 1.6 in 2024, hitting an all-time low. This isn’t just a statistic: even netting out migration flows, native populations are shrinking fast. Migration offsets the numerical decline but not the qualitative one: its effect is an epochal shift in the ethnic makeup of our societies.

In the U.S., the non-Hispanic white population, once the historic majority, now makes up less than 60%, and Census Bureau projections show it dipping below 50% around 2045. The picture isn’t much different in Western Europe, where forecasts suggest that by the end of the century, indigenous ethnic groups will lose their absolute majority everywhere. This profound ethnic and cultural transformation — without orderly, shared assimilation (impossible at these scales) — will weaken the sense of historical continuity that has always underpinned national cohesion. In the end, it could amount to the outright erasure of Western peoples.

Economically, the West has lost serious ground. According to 2025 IMF data, China now accounts for 20% of global GDP in purchasing power parity terms, surpassing the United States (14.5%) and the European Union (13.8%). In nominal terms the U.S. is still on top, but the gap is closing fast. The manufacturing decline is even starker: China alone produces roughly 28-30% of global manufacturing value added, about as much as the U.S. and EU combined (CSIS). Thirty years ago the West dominated this sector; today it depends on supply chains largely controlled by Beijing, with obvious implications for economic security. Deindustrialization has hollowed out entire regions, shrunk the manufacturing middle class, and fueled a sense of insecurity that has eroded trust in the system.

Military power shows relative retreat too. The U.S. still leads in defense spending. But China has steadily invested in modernization and sheer numbers: it now has the world’s largest navy (over 370 warships vs. about 290 for the U.S.), with rapid growth in destroyers, submarines, and carriers. The U.S. keeps a tech edge and overall tonnage advantage, but the gap narrows year by year, while Europe — despite recent spending increases — still contributes little to collective defense.

Finally, decline shows up culturally and socially. Religiosity, a pillar of society for centuries (shaping social cohesion, demographics, artistic creativity, etc.), is in sharp decline: in the U.S., Christianity has fallen from 90% to 60% adherents in roughly three decades (Pew Research). In Europe the drop is even steeper, with regular religious practice below 10% in many countries (Euronews). At the same time, willingness to sacrifice for the national community has waned: recent Gallup polls show only 41% of Americans and an average of 32% of Europeans say they’d fight for their country in a war — among the world’s lowest rates. Trust in institutions is at historic lows: in the U.S., just 22% of adults trust the federal government, while in Europe confidence in national parliaments and governments has steadily declined for decades. These indicators reflect social fragmentation, a weakened sense of shared belonging, and lower resilience in the face of collective challenges.

In short, Rubio is right: the West isn’t doomed to decline, but it will be if it keeps denying the signs. Only a renewed commitment to conserving and reviving its civilization can halt this historical phase and restore the strength and confidence the West needs to face the future.

An Agenda for Rebirth

Europe can reverse its decline trajectory by starting with decisive reshoring of production and securing supply chains. Cutting dependence on foreign suppliers, bringing strategic sectors back home (from electronics and pharmaceuticals to steel and emerging tech), and incentivizing automation and workforce training would create millions of skilled jobs. That would strengthen the middle class — the backbone of any stable, solid society — reduce the insecurity fueling social discontent, and restore economic autonomy and strategic resilience to European nations.

A second essential step is returning to orderly, selective migration management. To preserve national and cultural identity, we have to recognize that assimilation takes time, controlled numbers, clear criteria — and above all, that immigration can enrich the national body but shouldn’t aim to replace it, as in “replacement migration” logic. Policies favoring cultural proximity and rapid assimilation would ease social tensions, boost cohesion, prevent parallel communities that undermine shared belonging, and reduce risks of “fifth columns” for hostile external actors.

Finally, Europe must urgently tackle its demographic crisis with bold family policies. Only a rebound in native birth rates can ensure generational renewal, prevent pension system collapse, and give armed forces the young people needed for basic deterrence against those dreaming of conquering the West. A shortage of “fighting-age” men can wipe out any gains from military modernization. As Rubio noted, though, quantity isn’t enough: moral quality matters too. We need to rediscover and pass on values of patriotism, collective responsibility, and pride in our civilization — so young Europeans are not just numerous, but willing to defend their way of life with conviction. Only then can Europe become strong, secure, and confident again.

Europe in the NSS

As American expert Matthew Kroenig noted, Rubio’s Munich speech drew criticism in some European think-tank circles but was fairly well received by politicians for its emphasis on the tight transatlantic bond. In truth, it aligns closely with the National Security Strategy (NSS), which also sparked outrage in parts of the Old Continent.

The NSS — wrongly spun by some media as anti-European — actually stresses that Europe remains vital to the U.S. both strategically and culturally. Criticisms of European policies are made in Europe’s own best interest: Washington calls out excessive ideological regulation because it hampers Europe’s own economy, and flags pro-immigration policies because they are erasing European civilization from within. The U.S. aims to back Europe in regaining self-confidence and Western identity, while promoting democracy, free speech, and a return to national spirit.

Of course the Trump administration isn’t a charity, and the NSS has plenty of elements that serve American interests first. But ultimately, the strategy keeps supporting European freedom and security — with a realist approach: the U.S. wants more autonomous and responsible allies.

The Civilizational Alliance

The best way to understand the Trump administration’s strategic offer is to read the NSS and Rubio’s speech through the lens of the widely discussed piece by Samuel Samson, Senior Advisor at the State Department, titled “The Need for Civilizational Allies in Europe.”

Samson argues that the U.S.-Europe bond isn’t merely transactional — it’s deep and rooted in a shared Western civilizational heritage: culture, faith, law, ethics, sovereignty, and other “kinships” tracing back to Greco-Roman antiquity and Christianity. Yet he points to Europe’s “retreat” from these core shared values, echoing JD Vance’s words from the previous Munich Conference: the real threat is internal. Digital censorship, mass immigration, curbs on religious freedom, and assaults on democracy are symptoms of Europe’s moral crisis.

Samson highlights these issues not to abandon Europe but, on the contrary, to extend a hand from Washington to its Western brothers. He describes these trends — which remind him of tactics used against Trump in the U.S. — as attacks by a “decadent” ruling class on authentic Western civilization. The Trump administration wants to reorient the transatlantic relationship around “civilizational” allies who truly defend these values. The vision is a U.S.-Europe bond grounded in common heritage rather than globalist conformity — one that can renew itself and grow even stronger.

The Floor Is Europe’s

What the United States is offering Europe isn’t a “consensual divorce,” much less an “external rescue,” but a shared rebirth. Washington isn’t asking Europe to become more American — it is asking Europe to become fully itself again: proud of its heritage, jealous of its sovereignty, determined to pass on to its children both material well-being and a deep sense of belonging and mission. The choice isn’t between dependence on the United States and so-called “European autonomy”; it’s between an Europe that chooses to rediscover its roots alongside its historic transatlantic ally, and an Europe that keeps dissolving into borderless, identity-free cosmopolitanism.

Decline isn’t inevitable. Trump’s America is extending a hand — not to dominate, but to walk together toward a new century of vitality for Western civilization. It’s up to Europe to decide whether to take it — or to spurn it in disdainful deference to the cosmopolitan, progressive ideology that still shapes so many of its elites.

Note: The opinion expressed in the articles are those of the respective authors and may not reflect the views of the Machiavelli Foundation.

SHARE:

Author of the article

Related content